When two worlds clash…
It doesn’t always feel like it does, but worlds clash continuously and consistently. Probably that’s the only thing that is reliable about them, yet it’s always a struggle to reason about it.
The explanation evades the experience, even though one is extremely simple and easy, while the other tends to end up being tenuous and misleading.
And I often wonder why?
How come experience is clear while our understanding of it is muddied?
Is it the fault of the language that conceives it into this world through words, or simply a faulty interpretation system that observes what is, but doesn’t really touch it to be able to fully understand?
That kind of makes sense… and at the same time, it’s not a fulfilling answer. It feels vague and drifting.
Which reveals another thing to be wary of: what if the ambiguity is part of the deal? A core component that can’t be reduced but instead always escapes into new interpretations.
Like an abstract painting on the wall, never seen with the same eyes or understanding ever more than once.
Its nature is ever-changing, and that’s not a faulty design but, kind of, the whole point.
To worlds clashing without the words that express them, resting in the full experience that shapes them. Cheers 🥂🥂
Until the next ❤️ beat ~.~.~




This really landed for me. I’m not tired of the clash, I’m actually tired of being asked to make it coherent. This piece let the tension exist without forcing resolution, and that felt honest. Thank you for that.
Cheers!